Talk:Pecuniary externality
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Not Much Here
[edit]I guess that something is better than nothing, but this article really needs more. Maybe someone feels like going back to Viner (1931).
Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg
[edit]Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Contrast with technological externalities?
[edit]This stub might be expanded by contrasting pecuniary externalities with technological externalities, a point made by some authors (e.g., Margolis & Liebowitz 1994) when critically discussing network externalities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.3.185 (talk) 21:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)