This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article has a verbose and bombastic tone[edit]
Much of this article is overly complicated, repetitively written and full of anachronistic phrasing such as in the section entitled Wensleydale Peerage Case (1856) the opening paragraph begins with "the House of Lords grew from the antediluvian authority of the Curia Regis".
That's not plain, simple English. It's waffle and pompous waffle, too!
Lord Black's conviction for fraud has, as yet, no bearing on peerage law so there is no need to refer to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.244.65.143 (talk) 02:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
