Talk:People's Republic of South Yorkshire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sheffield High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal People's Republic of South Yorkshire is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Public Transport

Heavily subsidizing public transport???

What were they thinking?

Surely they were not trying to achieve a fair and equitable society!

I mean, how would people get rich like that???

117.14.96.231 (talk) 07:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

This article needs to be deleted. The local politics of a particular area of the UK during a particular time in history does not qualify as noteworthy. It's also happens to be a complete mess of an article, with nothing other than the author's arbitrary discretion to decide which of the government's policies at the time qualify for mention in this article.

Tried removing the crap from the article, but someone is very protective over this shoddy work. Perhaps he'd like to:

Provide sources for the claims being made, explain the notability of the article, explain the relevance of Hallam being a wealthy area, explain the relevance of there being war memorials in sheffield, explain the relevance of the items in the list of policies to the nickname of the area and tell us why his opinion of what is and is not ironic in british politics belongs in an encyclopedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.43.72 (talk) 00:29, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You sir, are a party-pooper. 78.149.196.209 (talk) 20:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't like seeing articles full of left wing bias in a supposedly neutral encyclopaedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.43.72 (talk) 13:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Housing

Park Hill flats were constructed between 1957 and 1961, so they're irrelevant to an article about the City Council's policies or actions in the 1980s.

I'm not aware of any construction of "large council estates with large numbers of communal blocks of flats based on the streets in the sky philosophy" during the period in question.

108.171.128.180 (talk) 12:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on People's Republic of South Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121106175739/http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/factual/pip/mseyw/ to http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/factual/pip/mseyw/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]