Talk:Pepsi Invaders/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Namcokid47 (talk · contribs) 18:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You took a look at some of my older nominations, so I thought I'd try doing the same as to help clear out some of these. Namcokid47 (talk) 18:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, a couple of things:

Because both of these sections are so short, I suggest merging the Gameplay and Development sections into one.
- Done for this and the impact section.
Per this discussion, screenshots are not allowed in the infobox, so I would move it to the Gameplay section. The game doesn't have an official box from what I can see, so I would say using an iamge of the cartridge is okay.
- I don't find that the discussion is really relevant here. The arguments made don't really apply, as the cartridge is not likely to be the most well-known aspect of the game. This is certainly an exception to the rule.
Impact and rarity can be merged together too. I also think the line "Most of the cartridges were discarded due to disinterest by their recipients" could be moved into the development paragraph.
- Mm, I dunno about that; I feel that it being in this section helps to elaborate upon its rarity. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- That said, I'm going to try and address length issues and seek out more sources if possible before I'd like to see this passed (if it does). - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's looking a lot better now. Few more things:

The Apprentice link needs to be fixed, leads to a DAB page at the moment.
Pipe link for Coca-Cola Company should be removed so it matches with the lead.
"Most of the cartridges were discarded due to disinterest by their recipients" should probably be moved into the History section.