Talk:Person

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Person article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 60 days

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Humanoid person

add data

savvy extraterrestrial alien
empathetic robot with electronic limbic-like system (not simply mimicking a behavior as a result)

Person-god

(description of god ->) Person-god (the noun "personal god" has been distorted in the past as a description of the relationship between god and man)

http://archive.fo/aGURK

a book... probably not the best one, but by avoiding to create the page personocracy we simply miss some issues which aren't well expressed

BOOK of ABSTRACTS - easst

https://easst.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/EASST_2010.pdf system; second, democracy; and, third, the so-called personocracy. ...... Latour, B. (1996) Aramis or The Love of Technology, Cambridge: Harvard University

Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I don't have X to Y changes but I think it would be cool to include the Buddhists talking about the definition of a person in the Bhārahārasūtra which is " that man/human who has such a name, who has such an orgin, who belongs to such a lineage, who has such a livelihood, who experiences such pleasures and pain , who has such a long lifespan, who remains for such a long time, whose life has such an end" sources: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/personhood-india/#Budd https://www.academia.edu/37446866/Is_There_a_Burden_bearer_The_Sanskrit_Bhārahārasūtra_and_Its_Scholastic_Interpretations https://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/DLMBS/en/search/search_detail.jsp?seq=540237 SangyeTenzin (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Without providing the actual edit this is just a suggestion or discussion, rather than an actual edit request. If you provide the prose you'd like to include, feel free to re-open the request. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]