Talk:Persoonia lanceolata/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 02:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Very fine work! Pardon my fiddling during a review, but I'm a disgusting nitpicker ;) Anyway, for now, a few questions:

• Does P. lanceolata have variation in or out of synonymy? Where does Linkia lanceolata fit into the taxonomic history?

All variant names now mentioned. One odd form is now a new species (menioned in text) Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

• Any similar species associated with misidentification?

added Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

• Biochemical properties? Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

not as far as I can tell/see. Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:24, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

That looks like everything, and all criteria look green :) Good to go! Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

thx - much appreciated :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article Persoonia lanceolata passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass