Talk:Pink Slime Journalism
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 April 2017. The result of the discussion was redirect to Hack writer. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alex.simon97.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review[edit]
Hi this is Jackie and I am peer viewing the Pink slime Journalism article. I thoroughly enjoyed the article and I though it was very insightful take on media and the shift to digital media. I would love to see more example of pink slime journalist and more references to examples because it would make the article more diverse.JMaccmns (talk) 23:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Evidence Against Deletion[edit]
I believe I have provided additional information to support the fact that this term is common in the study of journalism and is an important term for the understanding of the future of the industry. 'Pink Slime Journalism' should not be overlooked by companies and should be understood by those who consume media. This page contributes to knowledge in society and I believe that deleting this page is unnecessary solely because the term isn't yet as popular in the media system. I hope this discussion helps save this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex.simon97 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)