Talk:Pixie Hollow

Amusement Parks: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Screenshot

WE NEED A SCREEN SHOT!--WinifredJ (talk) 21:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)--WinifredJ (talk) 21:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rating

It seems that whoever made the infobox has mistaken "Rating" for "Review/Reception". The page needs an appropriate rating (e.g. "E for Everyone"), and the current comments in that section should be moved to the main article with proper citations. 74.210.86.205 (talk) 07:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Pixie Hollow (Disney attraction)

Pixie Hollow previously redirected to the online game section in the Disney Fairies article. However, most of the articles linking to "Pixie Hollow" discuss the theme attraction rather than the online game. I fixed the links so that those article discussing the online game now have the link to Disney Fairies#Online game, while those talking about the attraction keep the "Pixie Hollow" link. --LoЯd ۞pεth 23:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stub Type?

This article is obviously a stub, but I could not find the correct type. Maybe it is right the way it is, or you could look over it.

TTorres896 (talk) 00:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Split proposal

The page about splitting starts out, "If an article becomes too large or a section of an article has a length that is out of proportion to the rest of the article...." Neither of those is the case here. There is no need to split this article. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 17:53, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]