Talk:Plasma needling
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Hello DGG,
you appear to be very experienced in the Wikipedia submission procedure. I never intended to advertise the technique of plasma needling, that is why I tried to make clear, that plasma needling claims to rejuventae, reduce etc.. Also, the chosen wording and the added links to PUBMED should make clear, that an additional benfit to the classical microneedling procedure (CIT - collagen induction therapy) by adding PRP is yet not scientifically supported due to lack of highly significant results/ data from large scale clinical trials.
To perform a plasma needling, you just need a microneedling device and a way to produce PRP - as simple as that. - Microneedling devices are offered by hundreds of companies and there is a broad variety of ways to produce PRP from a persons blood. So, there is no financial benefit for me or any company involved. The only reason I chose the name Dermaroller is, because I was asked to add more wiki-internal links.
Plasma needling can be performed at any practice or clinic for a quite reasonable price (because there is no branding associated with it)and is finacially much more favourable as well as less harmfull to the skin as lasers or a chemical peeling. This is why I also tried to prevent, that a single person or company can brand and patent the name or procedure itself, because it suddenly would be expensive and a part of the "industry" - like it happended to the use of PRP-injections in the face with vampire facelift (now that really is an advertisemnt in Wikipedia). Also I wanted to state (to stay verifiable), that plasma needling already is and has been performed in the field of aesthetic and reconstructive medicine by giving an example using the link of that practice in Germany.
I think we already have to many patents and brands in medical science, even some genes are patented right after beeing decoded successfully. So after all, my article intended to be just the opposite of an advertisement. I tried to stay neutral, using facts and figures. Please give me some hints to improve the article according to the regulations of Wikipedia, so that it clearly underlines my intentions.
Best regards, Doctormeduniv (talk) 09:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)