Talk:Politics of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
File:Seal of the National Transitional Council (Libya).svg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Seal of the National Transitional Council (Libya).svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC) |
File:Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi in Dimashq.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi in Dimashq.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:00, 23 December 2011 (UTC) |
Remove unnecessary qualifiers- ‘nominally’ and ‘theoretically’ in the introduction of the legislative and political realities of Gaddafi’s politics?
[edit]The proliferation of qualifiers such as ‘theoretically’ and ‘nominally’ only serves to weaken this article. I would suggest the removal of such qualifiers in sections which are sui generis devoted to describing the political philosophy and politico-legal frameworks existent in Gaddafi’s Libya.
The existence of these qualifiers brings unnecessary doubt not only about the actuality of the implementation of these principles (which is confronted satisfactorily enough in the ‘history section’, making the use of such terms as ‘nominally’ and ‘theoretically’ examples of weak writing and nothing more. These inconsistencies between claims and subtext undermine not only the value of this article but also the factual basis of all and any claims about the politics of Gaddafi’s Libya. 5.56.148.195 (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)