Talk:Praemonitus Praemunitus

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles

Books

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

--Ludvikus 00:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquote[edit]

Does this belong in wikiquote? --Yono 23:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation?[edit]

I do not think it should be in wikiquote.

But perhaps it should have a disambiguation.

To distinguish the adage from the book title of the Protocols of Zion.

And perhaps its nolomger a stub.

yours, etc. Ludvikus 22:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Protocols of Zion[edit]

This is the title of an annotated 1920 American edition of "The Protocols." It is exceedingly rare as an antisemitica item. It is a third (3rd) distinct translation into the English language. The first is The Jewish Peril. The second is The Protocols and World Revolution. Yours truly, --Ludvikus 00:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Physically, in its artistic, bibliophilic, appearance, it is the most beautiful--esthetically.

Of course, that is especially the case, if one diregards its stupid contents!!!

Having looked at it, at the NYPL, it was treated like a valued rare book--it was layed out for me like one would expect with the Holy Bible. --Ludvikus 00:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Book & a Book Title[edit]

Maybe DISAMBIGUATION is required for "Praemonitus praemunitus" - the Latin adage? Yours truly, --Ludvikus 11:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]