Talk:Prize

Awards Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

categorization[edit]

Hi -- I proposed to merge the categories Category:Awards, Category:Prizes together; and further to merge Category:Award winners, Category:Prize winners, and Category:Recipients of formal honors. Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 January 9#Prize winners and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 January 9#Prizes. I know there are technical distinctions (prizes usually used for awards with money, but occasionally just for money rewards), but as a category, the distinctions seem hard to maintain and not very useful. --lquilter 15:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks. PPEMES (talk) 16:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message[edit]

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 22:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Award into Prize?[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

No consensus for any action and discussion stale. Klbrain (talk) 21:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ought Award (no interwikilinks) be merged into this article? If so, final destination article title would remain an open question. Could perhaps be Award, in accordance with the supposed thoughts behind the name of WP:WikiProject Awards, or arguably the even broader name distinction, or even simply "orders, decorations, and medals"? Naturally, the merged article content could still deal with different connotations of awards, prizes, decorations, etc., as already seen partly in Award or decoration. See also merged, completed category discussion here above on the talk page. PPEMES (talk) 21:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support, of course. I think Award is the most general/covers the broadest base (see also List of awards). ─ ReconditeRodent « talk · contribs » 13:13, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Think twice ? Award seems much broader than Prize; In Cognitive science Reward system is already an universal system..Yves.bertin (talk) 08:13, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a proposal to merge Prize money into Prize, with which I strongly disagree. It is an entirely specific article about the Royal Navy and if anything could be merged into Prize (law), although I'm not proposing this. MinorProphet (talk) 06:39, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Award or decoration renamed to Award. PPEMES (talk) 17:51, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Feel free to consult Template:Phaleristics for an overview illustration of the taxonomy. PPEMES (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.