Talk:Process and Reality
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Subjectivist?
[edit]Is Whitehead really a subjectivist? I've never heard him described in this way. I thought the philosophy of organism had more like a neutral monism than a subjectivism or idealism. --The Hanged Man 01:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Whitehead is not a subjectivist. As you say, if one tried to describe his scheme in otherwise established terms, one would be inclined to speak of neutral monism. That is essential to Whitehead's scheme.Chjoaygame (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Process Philosophy
[edit]Someone who knows more about Whitehead than I do (I know nothing) might want to rescue an overzealous explanation of this book from the Process Philosophy page, which also needs attention. --98.100.207.38 (talk) 09:44, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry if the Process philosophy article's account, largely written by me, of Process and Reality is "overzealous". Please explain what that means, or suggest or enact remedies. What do you mean "rescue"?Chjoaygame (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class philosophical literature articles
- Low-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- Stub-Class metaphysics articles
- Low-importance metaphysics articles
- Metaphysics task force articles
- Stub-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- Stub-Class Book articles
- Book articles without infoboxes
- WikiProject Books articles