Talk:Process performance index/Archives/2015
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Untitled
This is wrong the performance index P is the reciprocal of the process capacity Index Cp. So all this stuff refers to the Cp index not the P index. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.245.118.131 (talk) 06:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
That's right. I quickly changed P to 1/P, but the article needs a rewrite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.253.196.22 (talk) 11:20, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's funny. Your definition doesn't match that given in the citations or any of the top search results (e.g., [1], [2], [3], [4], etc.). Could it be that you're pulling a prank? After all, 99% of readers won't question a nonsense edit if it looks authoritative enough! -- DanielPenfield (talk) 00:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)