Talk:Harold Ellis (surgeon)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This needs more information added to it.

Hi, I thought that this article could stay because Professor Ellis should be considered notable: he is a published author (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Cambridge-Illustrated-History-Surgery-Harold/dp/0521720338), and extremely highly regarded within his field. Indeed, he is a fellow of the Royal Society of Surgeons (FRCS) and a few of the guidelines in the Notability (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PROF) are met. Hope this clarifies my position and holds this article in a better standing (although it really needs more work!) Thanks! Daryl Cheng 09:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darylcheng (talk • contribs)

Seconded. Professor Ellis should be considered notable. His book, Clinical Anatomy Ellis, H. Mahadevan, V. (2010), now is in it's 14th edition can be considered a definitive resource offering medical students, postgraduate trainees and junior doctors a comprehensive resource in their training. Professor Ellis has been published multiple times, been featured in the media, and is renowned in the medical field.

It should be noted that this entry is missing a more detailed timeline of education, work, and press/ media features. Stew-dreamt-roger-betaken (talk) 09:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]