Talk:Project 21956

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Future_of_the_Russian_Navy#Destroyers.

Ships

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Russia

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles

Comments

Specs here: http://www.deagel.com/Destroyers-and-Cruisers/Project-21956_a002084001.aspx

Alexkvaskov (talk) 23:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that this class was an export proposal back in 2007 which failed to generate interest and has been abandoned. It is highly unlikely that any units of this class will be laid down.Alexkvaskov (talk) 18:57, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

US Navy hull classification on foreign vessels

I don't agree with the usage of the US Navy hull classification system for a Russian ship. Even if terms such as DDG were used by NATO for foreign non-NATO vessels (which I seriously doubt), this is an encyclopedia where it's better to "open up" such terms. Also, I added a citation needed to the chapter as there was none. Tupsumato (talk) 02:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]