Talk:Psychoactive drug/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This review is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Introduction is too short, see WP:LEAD for more info. The introduction should be a summary of the entire article.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
There is one {{cn}} template, so I'll have to point that one out, otherwise a good job with the citations... except for the lists. Lists need cites too. Also, four refs have dead links, 19, 22, 27, and 34.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
A good article, but lack of sources (live or dead) and an inadequate introduction are holding it back. Article will be placed on hold until issues can be addressed. If an editor does not express interest in addressing these issues within seven days, the article will be delisted. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 23:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been delisted. Feel free to renominate when the issues have been addressed. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 21:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]