Talk:Pubic hair fetishism

	Human sexuality portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gallery?

The photos in the gallery section of this page are completely unnecessary, except for the fetishists themselves who come to this page to get their rocks off. There's a single photo at the top of the page illustrating what pubic hair is. That should be enough. 68.77.21.60 (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I also think that most of the material in this article has anything to do with fetishism.Enthusiast (talk) 10:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paraphilia?

I don't really grasp what makes this a 'paraphilia'. Pubic hair grows naturally and it used to be the norm to leave it on. I'm quite young myself (generation Y, i.e. generation with a significant population suffering 'hair phobia'), but I don't see what makes this unusual. Witproduct (talk) 21:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First painting depicting pubic hair

It's not the one mentioned in the article but Death and the maiden from Hans Baldung in 1517. Wikitom2 (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fetish

In the article on Fetish, there are no descriptions of body parts being a fetish. In this article there are descriptions of all sorts of things, but none of them seem to be the definition of pubic hair fetishism. It may be a nelogism. Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 22:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]