Talk:Pumping

Censorship?

I've reverted several edits that attempted to remove links to Sexual intercourse and/or Anal sex. My main concern is that this may be an attempt at censorship. Wikipedia is not censored. The usage appears to be legitimate; see for example the Urban Dictionary. I'm open to arguments for deleting these links—I had initially considered doing so myself, but had second thoughts about it.--Srleffler (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I originally removed the entries was that I found it to be highly unlikely that anyone would be searching on the word "pumping" looking for an article on sex, and neither of the articles linked to mentioned the term. If we want to assume that someone might be, then I think that one entry for Sexual intercourse should be enough. While it would be possible to link to anal sex, Non-penetrative sex, Mammary intercourse, and who knows what else, it really doesn't serve the disambiguation page by listing endless variations on something that no one is likely to be looking for. Sexual intercourse is our main article on this topic and links to a variety of others, so it seems like the best choice for this entry. --Xyzzyplugh (talk) 02:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK.--Srleffler (talk) 03:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]