Talk:Push poll/Archives/2015
Appearance
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
POV ?
An anonymous IP has deleted the Australia section several times. A new editor can be forgiven some misunderstanding of proper Wikiquette, this time they have included a summary so I think we should at least consider their point of view. Summary as follows.
Deleted paragraph for blatent (sic) political bias. Unlike the American example this example was judgemental, unbalanced and poorly referenced, even for a section of it's size.
--Andrewaskew (talk) 06:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Disagree the source does say everything covered in this section. While the Telegraph is sometimes accused of a conservative bias, this particular incident appears to have been reported accurately. --Andrewaskew (talk) 06:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Disagree. I see no political bias in it, it is IMHO neutral and well sourced, and should stay. Thomas.W (talk) 06:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- I guess we should try and find some examples of LNP push polling. I'm sure there was some scandal involving them in this area at some point. Tigerman2005 (talk) 04:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)