Talk:Pyura

Animals Low‑importance

Pyura is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

The following discussion has been moved from 'Sea tulip':

If I recall correctly, there are a number of different species of sea tulips, although all share the same obvious features ('stem' and 'flower'). As such, having this page describe only a single type of sea tulip may be incorrect. Feel free to move the current content to a separate page if/when more sea tulip species are added.

--pjf 13:23, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Ok. I've been thinking about what you wrote. Sorry to take 5 years to reply. Yes. I think this article should be about the genus. If there are no objections, I will fix it. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing in progress.... Seascapeza (talk) 08:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequent to the fixing: a brief scroll through Google images (plus experience with South African Pyura) convinced me that though some of the members of this genus may well have the 'stem'/'flower' look, this is certainly not an obvious characteristic of the genus as a whole. Consequently, I have written a stub article for the genus, listing all the species according to http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=103524, and created a redirect from 'sea tulip' to Pyura spinifera which I believe to be the common name for the species.

Seascapeza (talk) 09:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]