This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles
In the Operation section: "Engineers are on QRA duty three or four times a year, each for a twenty-four-hour a day shift for seven days at a time."
This appears to say that the Engineers are on 7 days of 24 hour shifts, which means 168 hours continuously. I'm pretty sure that's impossible. Gwideman (talk) 10:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems very UK biased. Can we find a way to talk about operations and response without only talking about the UK? And what about non-European NATO members? What do the US and Canada do? DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The history section is also very stubby. It's basically one statement that QRA is the successor to Battle of Britain scrambling, which doesn't take much working out, and some random facts about when the Typhoon was introduced. DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
