Talk:Headley Court

Surrey Low‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

This page has an infobox that is missing one or more vital fields and needs to be updated.
Please consult the relevant WikiProject or this category to find the appropriate usage.

Does not conform to basic Wiki standards eg NPOV.[edit]

Refer to Wikipedia:Five_pillars John 14:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've tempered that. Architecture and setting were thinly described. Treatment was adjective-rich. And indeed somewhat put something about youths being twats in which was obvious but hardly encyclopedic.- Adam37 Talk 15:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RAFHeadleyCourt.jpg[edit]

Image:RAFHeadleyCourt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC) The link to the HIVE PDF requires a username and password - can an open version be linked?[reply]

'Rehabilitation staff average around 200 per year...'[edit]

Why 'per year'? Why not 'Number of rehabilitation staff averages around 200'?

Regards to all Notreallydavid (talk) 09:32, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it better for context to give a time frame. It doesn't necessarily follow they were ALL working from one end of the year to the next; some staff could be on short term contracts and those who are Service personnel would move in or out of the establishment at intervals in the nature of the Forces' posting system.Cloptonson (talk) 17:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]