Talk:RDS-37

Cold War High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Untitled

Someone replaced Image:Soviet super test.jpg with Image:Rsd_37_nuclear_test.JPG. This may be good and wonderful, but I put an unsourced tag on Image:Rsd_37_nuclear_test.JPG, as it has no source (insert usual wikipedia blather about unsourced images). Any help here before we scream "delete!"?

dino 18:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the source where I got the RDS-37 image. -Tzar

Uh, yeah... that's a picture of Tsar Bomba, not RDS-37. 99.247.26.159 17:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what does "real" (staged) mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.94.13.57 (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article states "but was more similar to a "boosted" fission bomb than a megaton range hydrogen bomb.", while this test was infact in the megaton range, i think it was 1.45m, while the full deployed weapon was supposed to yield 3mton. This particular line needs to be rewritten, as this was infact a megaton range weapon, it just didnt use a staged design. Wims (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You need to re-read the passage more carefully. The "more similar to boosted fission" bomb was RDS-27, the one with the "sloika" design. It yields, at best, about 325 MT. The RDS-37 was indeed, a radiation-implosion secondary, such as was used with Ivy/Mike and every other fusion weapon since, and yields range up into the megatons, as indeed it did. The "real" staged design uses the soft x-ray radiation of the primary to compress the secondary rather than to simply heat it, as the sloika does. Both processes will allow for fusion, but heating take too long, allowing for the exploding primary to scatter the fusion elements before they can really get started. That is the innovation which Urey, Teller and Sakharov came to more-or-less simultaneously (give or take about 10 years, depending on how much you believe Teller's bombast about having known about it for years).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Skylab1995.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rsd 37 nuclear test.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Rsd 37 nuclear test.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Initiation?!

This sounds as though it was a Russian translation issue. Standard English wording is "explosion" or "detonation" and it should be changed throughout.Cancun (talk) 15:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Awful journalistic drafting

I've tried to make some improvements to the EN in the "Important Results" section, but the third para is very badly drafted in a journalistic style. Much of it doesn't say anything useful, and sometimes it is almost comical. I suggest deletion. "The thermonuclear weapons race between the United States and the Soviet Union exceeded all expectations set out before the scientists who took part. Two countries creating thermonuclear weapons with such energy yields from two different design methods proved to be the crowning achievement for science in the 1950s" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theeurocrat (talk • contribs) 19:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fatalities

I now learned from a video that the test lead to 2 fatalities, a soldier and a little girl. I didn't see it mentioned here. --Slow Phil (talk) 14:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]