Talk:Rack-O

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I removed a PROD put here by an IP. My reason: Racko! is a game produced by Parker Brothers and distributed widely (and I think it's still being sold, which makes it a long run, too)... there's no reason to think this is non-notable, and I see no reason not to get into the details of the rules in the article either. In any case, if someone still feels this is non-notable, it should go to WP:AFD not PROD. Mango juice^talk 19:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Why is the title Racko! when the game is called Rack-o? ColinClark (talk) 06:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like just an oversight by the topic creator that was never corrected. — CobraWiki ^{( jabber | stuff )} 22:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Rack-O Mike Cline (talk) 21:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Racko! → Rack-O – The name of the game is either referred to as Racko or Rack-o depending on when you looked at it. 50+ years ago, it was Racko See PDF more recently its been Rack-OSee PDF. Also see this picture of the cards File:Racko-game.jpg where there is a dash before the 'O'. Any assistance with this would be great. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to Rack-O per nom. – Pnm (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support move. I have often wondered if the punctuation character is meant to be a dash or a dot because showing a diamond even in instructions does not make it clear. Other sources likely assume it to be a dash or use a dash because it is the easier character to type. Either way, it's the more correct option than the current one. — CobraWiki ^{( jabber | stuff )} 01:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: On a side note the newest version of Rack-O actually has a formal dash as opposed to a diamond: See Target Website. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.