Talk:Radziejów

~~The Google Video posted as reference had no sound, so I removed the link to it, and the material that was referenced with it~~. Balcer 13:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC) My bad, the sound works, it was a problem on my end. Balcer 15:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The entry was extremely biased. In fact, this wiki was edited by someone who runs a website (http://www.polandinjustice.com/) that obviously has a personal vendetta, therefore i removed the anti-Polonist statements. In fact, the previous editor even links to this entry from his website which proves an obvious bias. Do we really need to know that a father & his son from a nearby village were treated poorly by Poles? No, we don't. How does it relate to the history of this town? It doesn't therefore I removed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.11.19 (talk) 01:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once again someone is finding it necessary to add content that adds absolutely NOTHING to the history of the town of Radziejow. It is heresay first of all. Second, the person adding this has a personal bias as the source of his information is his OWN FATHER. The author hosts a website that links to this article, therefore I see many biases in these additions and prefer to keep them out. Not to mention they border on anti-Polonism, of which the author is guilty as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.152.10.41 (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever keeps reverting the page is not giving reasons and has not even answered WHY they should be kept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.152.10.41 (talk) 15:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Undue weight concerns

There is a sizable blog out there at http://radziejow.blogspot.com/ which is entitled "Poland Injustice: One man's struggle against the continuing injustice of an anti-semitic Polish village against his family", with the village in question being the town of Radziejów. With a title like that, I don't believe the author has a neutral point of view, so essential to Wikipedia. If someone connected to the blog is making controversial changes here (and given the obscurity of Radziejow that is very likely), I invite him/her to rethink their attitude.

Specifically, while I can understand the pain of someone whose family was mistreated in that town, that personal experience cannot be given extensive treatment in this article, which is after all about a modern European town in all its aspects. Please see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Undue_weight for Wikipedia policy in this matter. 74.15.21.141 (talk) 18:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is exactly what is/was happening. I called this person out on it previously. Unacceptable. Hopefully it's stopped now. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.162.50.50 (talk) 01:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Radziejów. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]