Talk:Ray Donovan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Television (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborate effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 20:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Ray Donovan (TV series)Ray Donovan – A clear case of WP:COMMONNAME/WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The TV series article has been viewed 866,957 times in the last 90 days, whereas the labor secretary article was viewed 409 times. A hatnote for the labor secretary, who is most frequently cited in Google and Google News as "Raymond J. Donovan" anyway, should be sufficient. -- Wikipedical (talk) 04:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Reception summary[edit]

@Robberey1705: please explain why you find it necessary to keep the summary of awards on top of the awards chart. Especially considering it only includes a select few of nominations/wins (only Schreiber's 2016 nom, not Voight or Azaria. Only 2013 and 2014 Golden Globe noms/wins but not 2015, etc) --Joef1234 (talk) 00:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

In at least two cases, this is because of the given sources which don't fit into the table (you can bring in a "source" section of course.). Some of the linkend articles are not in the tabel either. So you can't just erase them.--Robberey1705 (talk) 02:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
I've added a source section. So hopefully that solves the issue? Joef1234 (talk) 03:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
For me, that's okay. Thanks. Don't know what other editors say, but at least this is a possibility.--Robberey1705 (talk) 19:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)