Talk:Reciprocal gamma function

Separate page

I'm slightly worried that a separate page for this function might be redundant, but there is too much to say about the Gamma function to put everything in one place. It appears that the reciprocal Gamma function is sometimes considered as a separate topic, and I know the sections I've started here can be fleshed out. Thoughts? Fredrik Johansson - talk - contribs 20:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like it. Nice job! linas 00:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) Fredrik Johansson - talk - contribs 13:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page lacks citations and so it is hard to find the original sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.25.37.28 (talk) 01:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]