Talk:Referendums in New Zealand

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

New Zealand: Politics Top‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Referendums in New Zealand was the New Zealand collaboration from 22 May, to 4 June 2006. For details on how the article improved, see the NZC history

Useful sources

Atkinson, Neill. Adventures in Democracy: A History of the Vote in New Zealand. Dunedin: Otago University Press, 2003.
Baron, Steve. 2004. It's a Civil Decision! In, http://www.betterdemocracy.co.nz/articleAA.php. (accessed 12 April, 2006).
Better Democracy. Endorcements of BCIR. In, http://www.betterdemocracy.co.nz/endorsements.php. (accessed 12 April, 2006).
———. Statement of Intention. In, http://www.betterdemocracy.co.nz/objectives.php. (accessed 12 April, 2006).
Catt, Helena. "The Other Democratic Experiment: New Zealand’s Experience with Citizens’ Initiated Referendum." Political Science 48, no. 1 (1996): 29-47.
Church, Stephen. "Crime and Punishment: The Referenda to Reform the Criminal Justice System and Reduce the Size of Parliament." In Left Turn: The New Zealand General Election of 1999, edited by Jonathan Boston, Stephen Church, Stephen Levine, Elizabeth McLeay and Nigel S. Roberts. Wellington: Victoria University Press, 2000.
Referendums: Constitutional and Political Perspectives, edited by Alan Simpson, Wellington: Occasional Publication No.5, Department of Politics, Victoria University of Wellington, 1992.
James, Colin. "Riding into Battle over Socially and Morally Divisive Bills." New Zealand Herald, July 29 2003.
New Zealand Press Association. "Referendum Call on Maori Seats " The Dominion, 5 MAY 1999, 2.
Palmer, Geoffrey, and Matthew Palmer. Bridled Power: New Zealand's Constitution and Government. fourth ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Parkinson, John. "Who Knows Best? The Creation of the Citizen-Initiated Referendum in New Zealand." Government and Opposition 36, no. 3 ( 2001): 403 - 21.
Prince, John D. "Look Back in Amber: The General Licensing Poll in New Zealand, 1919-87." Political Science 48, no. 1 (1996): 48-72.

I hope that helps people out. --Midnight tonight 07:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

city council

does anyone have info on city council usage of referendum. I will begin to look on Thursday if no one else has info, after this essay is due. --Midnighttonight 03:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My local council, just closed down a council owned camp ground, and a petition of some 5000 people asking for a referenda on the issue, the council response was ‘we don’t govern by referendum” and something about there been no law that govern weather councils have referendum. The $15000 cost for holding it was going to be paid for by a local businessman! if it was made binding.

As you can guess there have been calles to "replace the lot" next year, in the local paper :)

Not sure about other council’s through.

Luck with the essay, Brian | (Talk) 07:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About what I'd expect from a local council really. I was talking more about the changing electoral system stuff (which was done by postal ballot here in Wellington City) or the Fluridation stuff in Hamilton. But, I'll work on it in a few days time. --Midnighttonight 07:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

National licensing refereda

The majority of referenda (which is the plural of referendum incidently, not referendums) in New Zealand have been on liquor licensing. I don't think anyone is likely to ever create a seperate page on each of these, so it would make more sense to have one page on all of them, and have this included as such in the little box at the bottom. I wouldn't have a clue how to alter this (I don't even know what the little box is even called) so if someone else thinks this is a good idea, could they make the change? --Helenalex 21:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion on the plural of referendum was held before this article was created, at Wikipedia:New_Zealand_Collaboration_of_the_Fortnight/History#Referendums_in_New_Zealand. The evidence supplied from Talk:Referendums_in_Australia#Referenda_vs._referendum and the common practice at Referendums#Referendums_by_country led to this page being called "referendums".

I agree that the articles linked in the template will probably never be written, and I've suggested we delete the referendum part of the template entirely. See Template talk:New Zealand elections. I suggest you comment there, and if there is no opposition, I'll remove the referendum part in a week or so (feel free to prod me if I forget, or do so yourself).-gadfium 01:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mmp-poster.jpg

Image:Mmp-poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see it qualifying here, so I'll remove it from this article. (I've added a rationale for its retention in Electoral reform in New Zealand.) -- Avenue (talk) 11:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Referenda vs referendums

The standard plural is referenda. Evidence for this abounds:

a Google search in site:nz yields 8,630 for referenda and 2,740 for referendums, so referenda is over three times more common in New Zealand
a Google search over all sites yields 2,040,000 for referenda and 1,150,000 for referendums, so referenda is clearly the popular preference over the entire Google corpus
the official term in New Zealand is referenda as evidenced by its use in the title of the act, the election site, the cabinet manual and many others

This whole article grates to read because referendums is such an awkward construction. Can't we just move to the standard spelling?

Ben Arnold (talk) 23:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article was titled to be consistent with other such articles on Wikipedia. See Referendum#Referendums_by_country, and see Talk:Referendums_in_Australia#Referenda_vs._referendum for a discussion on what the terms actually mean.-gadfium 02:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unique?

The first citizens initiated referendum was held in 1995. The question "Should the number of professional fire-fighters employed full-time in the New Zealand Fire Service be reduced below the number employed in 1 January 1995?" is unique in that it aimed to elicit a "no" response. Turnout was low and the measure was voted down easily, with just over 12% voting "Yes" and almost 88% voting "No."

Is it unique? Doesn't the new referendum also aim to ellicit a NO response? 203.97.51.149 (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the statement to say that it was unusual rather than unique.-gadfium 02:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing the petitions

Hello. I don't have time to do it right this moment (maybe later if I remember), but if anyone feels the motivation then I wonder if the table of petitions and referendums would benefit from the listed proposals and question determinations being referenced back to the NZ Gazette. The official notifications by the Clerk of the House are all online. Here's a Gazette search which lists them all. https://gazette.govt.nz/home/NoticeSearch?act=Citizens+Initiated+Referenda+Act&soloRedirect=false Izogi (talk) 20:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]