Talk:Refusal to deal

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Material for an article:

Many states have enacted statutes, based upon the Sherman Act, that allow purely private business manufacturers the right to use their discretion in choosing the parties they want to do business with. Additionally, a manufacturer may discontinue a sales relationship with a customer whenever it chooses, so long as, there is no monopolization, conspiracy or combination of either. Therefore, a manufacturer or distributor of a product may restrict its sales to authorized dealers or provide certain exclusive territories to dealerships.
Nevertheless, if a manufacturer or distributor creates an agreement with its customers, dealers or franchisees that has an anti-competitive purpose or motive or if the agreement may produce the effect of anti-competition, even though there is no actual effect on competition, the State or Federal statutes may be violated. Such agreements are known as horizontal restraints of trade and are illegal per se. Generally, exclusive independent agreements to deal are valid unless there is a conspiracy agreement refusing to deal or a group boycott. [1]

--Uncle Ed 16:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"he was deceased"???

What's that supposed to mean? "decease" can't be used like that, according to the New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd edition © 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc.) --Blaisorblade (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]