Talk:Release print

Linkspam

I am not so sure that the link to the "Release Print" magazine belongs in this article. The publication doesn't seem to have any connection specifically to release prints, other than having a coincidental name. Following that logic, Mad Magazine would be a reference for the WP's article on mental disorders. Mattymatt 23:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, user Girolamo Savonarola seems to have agreed, because he deleted it. Mattymatt 00:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saying "Print" in filmmaking isn't the same as "Print: Release Print"

"Print" as a phrase in filmmaking refers to what takes will go through the "rush" in the color timing lab so as to be viewed for the dailies.

Making a "Work Print" is a totally different process, as it refers to making a print of the final complete film.

The link to this article and the article itself are referring to two different actions entirely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.49.157.11 (talk) 18:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explain it

Does it mean number of prints equals to the number of screens the movie is released the film is released at the same time? Eg:A film is released nationwide with 1000 prints.Does it means only 1000 theaters could show it simontaniously??

This is not necessarily true. Film can be run through multiple projectors at once. This is called interlocking and is a common practice in multiplexes. It can also be illegal, as the studio usually gives one print per screen and intends for the theater to only show it on that screen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.6.96.192 (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

117.98.187.97 (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are many factual errors here.

I've rewritten the article, correcting as many of them as I can. LDGE (talk) 14:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soft matte is the wrong term. Projectors use aperture plates to mask the light.

Aperture plates do not reduce film jitter. Its only function is to mask light. Film gates reduce jitter because they are actually in contact with the film. Aperture plates are placed between the film and lens.

Most importantly, why are aperture plates being discussed at all in this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.6.96.192 (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I kept this part in my rewrite because the presence or absence of a hard matte in printing is both part of the post-production workflow (and thus relevant to the manufacture of release prints) has a bearing on whether or not the projectionist is at risk of showing the print in the wrong ratio, i.e. how they're handled in the theatre. It's a toss up between whether this coverage belong here or in the projectionist entry, but on balance I think that here is the right place. LDGE (talk) 14:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.6.96.192 (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transition from film stock to digital?

The article strongly hints at but never overtly states that digital delivery is replacing (or largely has already replaced) release prints. Could a SME provide more information on this? Is this already covered elsewhere in the encyclopedia?--NapoliRoma (talk) 08:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Release print. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]