Talk:René Descartes/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 17:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Many paragraphs are unreferenced
A few questionable sources (primary mostly)
- Many paragraphs are unreferenced
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- The lead alone tells me that the article is not neutral enough. Too many praises, etc.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Per the above issues: Not enough in-line citations in the biography section, odd structure, questionable sources--Tomcat (7) 17:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: