Talk:Revolution (Beatles song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 23:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well written, I made a few minor copy-edits.[2]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   In early 1968, media coverage in the aftermath of the Tet Offensive spurred increased protests in opposition to the Vietnam War, especially among university students. The protests were most prevalent in the US, but on 17 March several thousand demonstrators marched to the American embassy in London's Grosvenor Square and violently clashed with police. Major protests concerning other political issues made international news, such as the March 1968 protests in Poland against their communist government, and the campus uprisings of May 1968 in France. needs citations. Y

   All references check out.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Good detail of production and reception, personnel, etc.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Suitable rationale, caption unnecessary in infobox, although one could be added.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for citations for 1968 demonstrations to be added. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

   I've added the requested citations. −Mainstream Nerd (talk) 22:26, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

   Thank you. This is good to go now. I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:53, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

   Thanks for the painless review process, and especially for your edits/fixes. −Mainstream Nerd (talk) 00:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

   No probs, an interesting article. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)