Jump to content

Talk:Richard Barre/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I madae a few minor copy-edits
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All online references checkout, I assume GF for print sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    As broad as possible
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I found a number of redirects in the wikilinks which need addressing.
    OK, I deem this worthy of GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NOTBROKEN, there isn't any need to fix redirects, however. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I just thought taht you might like to fix them. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I used to until I got chastised for fixing them ... Thanks for the review! Ealdgyth - Talk 22:37, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]