Talk:Richard Barre/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria[edit]
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- I madae a few minor copy-edits
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- All online references checkout, I assume GF for print sources.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- As broad as possible
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I found a number of redirects in the wikilinks which need addressing.- OK, I deem this worthy of GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Per WP:NOTBROKEN, there isn't any need to fix redirects, however. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I just thought taht you might like to fix them. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)