Talk:Ritual (Tiësto, Jonas Blue and Rita Ora song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
I will get on with this right away! --K. Peake 09:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]Should dance really be included as a genre in the infobox if dance-pop is already?Wouldn't "in various countries" be more appropriate right after the formats?"it was met with a warm reception" → "the song received a warm reception""the music of the song and" → "the music of it and""including in Canada, Norway," → "including Canada, Norway,"Poland should come before the certification body in that sentencePipe neon light to Neon lighting
Background and composition
[edit]"Few days prior its release," → "A few days prior its release,"Mention in the release sentence that it was for digital download and streaming in various countriesThe duration is not sourcedAgain, should dance be mentioned as a genre if dance-pop already is?
Reception
[edit]Maybe merge this with the below section and retitle to Reception and promotion per that being only one para?"to blend "driving instrumentals [...]" → "to blend a "driving instrumental [...]""ready to dance."" → "ready to dance"." per MOS:QUOTE"kickstart the weekend" → "kickstart your weekend" per the source's wording"foresaw it "to reign supreme in clubs" → "foresaw it as "destined to rule clubs" per above"it peaked at number 13" → "the song peaked at number 13"
Music video
[edit]Pipe neon lights to Neon lighting"Ora's appearance, stating that "she's" → "Ora's appearance, stating: "She's"
Track listing
[edit]Should acoustic really be capitalised?
Charts
[edit]- Good
Certifications
[edit]- Good
Release history
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Copyvio score looks great at 23.1%!!!
Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) on ref 6Cite Musicnotes.com as publisher instead on ref 8Wikilink The Music Network on ref 10Wikilink Rolling Stone on ref 13Remove HRT from brackets on ref 20Should OCC really be in brackets on ref 76?
Final comments and verdict
[edit]- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went smoothly as expected! --K. Peake 11:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @Kyle Peake: long time no see :D. Everything was addressed and thanks for the review! Iaof2017 (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Iaof2017 ✓ Pass now, however can you edit the talk page since I'm not able to on mobile? K. Peake 17:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @Kyle Peake: long time no see :D. Everything was addressed and thanks for the review! Iaof2017 (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)