Talk:Road Rovers

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

I use to watch this show all the time and then completly forgot about it. I feel kinda giulty.

Cleanup

Yow, this article needs some serious work. First of all, the Controversy section in particular sounds like it was pasted off a fan site, then starts rambling about the show's ratings and cancellation, all with absolutely no cites whatsoever. Discussion of fan fiction is completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia article and doesn't belong here at all. The entire tone jumps out of objectivity and right into a rabid fan's gushing about the show. The whole thing needs to be cleaned up and refined into an encyclopedic article and not a fansite.Rebochan 22:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through and removed the POV stuff you were talking about, but I'll probably need more time to dig up some reliable sources to replace the fact templates. Bl a st 20,02,07 2113 (UTC)

No Nonsense

Some unregistered user keeps posting stuff in this article and the ones about Hunter and Colleen concerning an unaired Road Rovers Christmas Special. I have run searches on a number of engines and turned up no trace of this, indicating that it's just junk. Could someone in charge block this article to non-registered users, please? .Ben 10 10:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE February 2017: Has anyone noticed that on the "characters" section of the article, a user has placed their own interpretation of the characters in the section. I will review the revision history to try and find who made the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan1783 (talk • contribs) 05:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC) \[reply]

2 March 2017: Thank you SineBot for autosigning my last edit. The edit that changed to the interpretation of the show by fan occurred on 06:43, 16 December 2016‎.

Cancellation

Wow! the whole cancellation story is completely false. The ratings were completely irrelevant. The true story is there was a law suit between Warner Brothers and Bruce Blumenfeld. I can't believe nobody had mentioned this before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.7.38 (talk) 00:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goofs

Is the goofs section really relevant? Lots42 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

14th episode proof?

Since the release of the DVD, I'm updating the listing for Road Rovers and the episodes on imdb.com and here. Is there tangible and verifiable proof of the 14th episode's actual release or is it just conjecture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.221.142.210 (talk) 05:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Yo dude, there is no EP 14. It's 2018 dummy!!![reply]

Cleanup

It's been a while since I've seen this show, but been working on making the character section make more sense. Definitely needed some work in the grammar area! ChooChooTheAlleyCat (talk) 11:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]