Talk:Rock edicts of Khalsi

India: Uttarakhand / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttarakhand (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.
	This article was last assessed in August 2018.

A page you started (Khalsi inscription) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Khalsi inscription, पाटलिपुत्र!

Wikipedia editor DBigXray just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see WP:COMMONNAME I believe it should be Kalsi edicts [1]

To reply, leave a comment on DBigXray's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

DBig Xray 20:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Title discussion[edit]

Moved from User talk:DBigXray

Khalsi inscription Thank you for your comment! I am really seeing both spellings, about equal in number: Kalsi and Khalsi. I added both in the introduction. Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 16:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK I also dont think this is an inscription. it is an edict. a stone. not a language or a script. [2] --DBig Xray 16:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right, I was a bit uneasy with just "inscription" to start with, but it's not just an edict, as there are 14 of them on the Khalsi rock. Stone would be smaller.... I kind of like "Rock edicts of Khalsi". पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 17:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think the current title is better than previous. but we already have a WP:COMMONNAME policy to guide us here. Can you list the sources and what word they use to call it below. That list will help us to decide on the popular name for it. --DBig Xray 11:51, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]