Talk:Rogers–Ramanujan identities

WikiProject Mathematics (Rated Stub-class, Low-priority)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mathematics rating:
 Stub Class
 Low Priority
Field:  Analysis

A Framework for the Identities: pov

In addition to probably having original research, the section "A Framework for the Identities" does not seem to be written from a neutral point of view. The discussion of authorship in that section is also far outside the mainstream of mathematical style: authors are typically presumed to have contributed equally.

Comment by Garfield Garfield

I think there was an article in Nature. I will try to find it. It is certainly not original research. Followup: The Nature Index doesn't show it. I saw it somewhere!

I removed the section as original research. As apparent from [1], the paper isn't even published yet, so there are no reliable sources for this, only a press release from Emory. When reliable sources appear, we can consider adding it back in in a neutral fashion. --Mark viking (talk) 02:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Continued Fraction

Should be ${\displaystyle {\frac {H}{G}}}$, see Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction.--Claude J (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)