Talk:Rogue (Doctor Who)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: TheDoctorWho (talk · contribs) 06:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: DoctorWhoFan91 (talk · contribs) 11:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this one, it has been sitting here for weeks! Most of my edits have been regarding Doctor Who, so I'm looking forward to reviewing this one. Expect remarks in 6-7 hours. - DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- It was simultaneously released on Disney+ in the United States on 7 June 2024 and on BBC iPlayer in the United Kingdom on 8 June. It was also broadcast the same day on BBC One. → It was simultaneously released on BBC iPlayer in the United Kingdom and Disney+ in the United States and everywhere else at 2300 UTC (US-7 June, UK-8 June). It was also later broadcast the same day on BBC One.
Plot
[edit]- accidentally interrupts a love confession between her and another man. Ruby comforts Emily → bit confusing, add failed love confession or something better
- believing him to be a Chuldur → believing him to be a Chuldur (because the Doctor is a shapeshifter)
Development
[edit]- Ref-7: Redirects without subscription, remove or find a better reference
Filming
[edit]- Reduce references in first line from 6 to 3-4
- Reduce ref in third line from 4 to 3
- Add ref from fifth line to fourth line as well, or turn them into one line.
Broadcast and Ratings
[edit]- Reformat everything except the last line similar to the lead.
- Add consolidated ratings as well as references of any upward/downward trend.
Critical Reception
[edit]- Reformat the paragraphs: one about similarities to other shows or previous episodes; the second about the Chuldur and the rest of the episode
- Expand the section, add a couple of lines from 2-3 of the reviews
References
[edit]- Ref-7 as mentioned
- Ref-14, 20, 21, 24: Not an issue, but replace with text sources wherever possible
- Ref-16: Looks like a fan-site, change (or delete)
- Ref 18, 19, 38: There have been discussions about the reliability of CultBox, but most DW articles use it, so I'll leave it to you if you wanna change them or not
Result
[edit]The article looks in good shape, just needs a few minor changes and slight expansion. Looks almost certain to pass, best of luck — DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 15:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC)