Talk:Royal Variety Performance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Rodeocowboy36 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&diff=715186595&oldid=715164254)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Untitled

The website states this years date as the 9th? --Camaeron 17:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One must remember that LWT provided weekend programming to London as early as 1968.71.222.116.50 (talk) 02:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arthurvasey (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For a number of years in the 70s, the Royal Variety Performance, despite being filmed in London, was an ATV production, rather than Thames or LWT. Could this be that ATV used to have the London weekend franchise and it had something to do with Bernard Delfont for many years.

I believe Bernard Delfont was Lew Grade's brother or something.

Missing years

How come some years are missing, such as 1977?--Tuzapicabit (talk) 13:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email

To: WIKIPEDIA From: Giles Cooper – Chairman, Royal Variety Charity Monday 18th April 2016

Dear Sirs

It has been brought to my attention that there are a couple of issues with relation to pages on Wikipedia that highlight the work of our charity, the ‘Royal Variety Charity’ and our annual fundraising event the ‘Royal Variety Performance’. I have had a chance to review the pages and am more than happy to provide you with the following:

COPYRIGHT ISSUES I confirm that the Royal Variety Charity grants Wikipedia non-exclusive license under Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts), of all material on our website(s), namely: www.royalvarietycharity.org / www.royalvarietyperformance.org / www.brinsworthhouse.org . We also note that this content we have donated is subject to continuous editing by the Wikipedia community and may be added to, subtracted from, rearranged, illustrated, split into multiple articles, translated into other languages, and otherwise changed beyond our expectations.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST I understand that you are concerned that a user with the pseudonym, ‘rodeocowboy36’, is employed or has a close connection to the Royal Variety Charity. We have reviewed the user’s statement online and I can confirm that no such user exists in our Admin team, so their claim that they work for this charity, or are closely connected to us, in any kind of capacity, is entirely false. We are however quite a high profile charity in the UK, with thousands of supporters and I would suggest that someone is acting independently to try and improve the image and standing of our charity online, but they are most certainly doing it without our knowledge and are making false claims that they have a connection to us. I would add though, that having reviewed all of the content online, I don’t believe there to be any malicious intent and certainly no commercial motive as we are an entirely ‘not for profit charity’. For your information, all the content that exists on both the page ‘Royal Variety Charity’ and ‘Royal Variety Performance’ appears to be 100% accurate, but whether it is written in a style and structure that is appropriate to Wikipedia, is entirely a matter for you to evaluate. It is, however, most definitely done from a neutral stand-point.

Should you require and further information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.

Yours faithfully,

Giles Cooper Chairman, Royal Variety Charity and Executive Producer of the Royal Variety Performance

PA, Cathryn Tomlinson Tel +44 (0)20 8898 8164 cathryn@royalvarietycharity.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.35.91.202 (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Note: this is the same message I've already posted at Talk:Royal Variety Charity Thank you, Giles Cooper (217.35.91.202)! Unfortunately we can't accept permission anonymously posted here (while this message shows every sign of being genuine, we can't know for sure that it is not a mistaken or malicious attempt to justify the copyright violations). If you'd like to donate content to Wikipedia and the world, please follow one of the paths outlined at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Thank you! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.royalvarietycharity.org/royal-variety-performance-home/history-of-the-royal-variety-performance as well as http://www.royalvarietycharity.org/royal-variety-performance-home and/or http://www.royalvarietycharity.org/royal-variety-charity. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]