Talk:Ryan FR Fireball/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 00:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

• "unsuitable for takeoff and landing aboard aircraft carriers carrier operations."
• "low-wing monoplane aircraft"
• "China Lake NAS" shouldn't NAS come first?
• " the FR-3, which would use have used"
• "cancelled" I'm not sure, but I think US spelling has only one l.
  • All done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Assessment

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: