Talk:SECR N class/GA1

GA Reassessment

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

Where books or journals are being used as references, the relevant pages should also be given.

It's often easier to separate the References into Notes and Bibliography, to make it easier to provide references to different pages in the same book.

The infobox provides imperial to metric conversions, but the body of the article does not.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, as far as I can tell. --Bulleid Pacific (talk) 00:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That'll do for me. Thanks for dealing with this Bulleid Pacific. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]