Talk:SMS Arminius/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Publisher locations needed in refs.
Added. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Were the Krupp guns muzzle or breech-loaders? And I presume that they were rifled, right? Link to Penn and armored frigate.
Same as in Friedrich Carl - I can't find any more information on the guns. Links added. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
No photos available on the net?
Same as Friedrich Carl again. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Add the photo on commons and we'll be done here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's no source for that, and according to the WI article by Sullivan, the WZ-Bilddienst holds the copyright. When I get around to it, I'm actually going to nominate it for deletion based on that. Parsecboy (talk) 00:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your call, but I'd like to see something, even a fair-use scan from Groener.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]