Talk:SMS Bayern (1878)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7 - public(talk) 08:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this review on as well. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 08:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion 1[edit]

  • The lead says the the Bayern was modernized in Stettin, while the Service history section claims that it was modernized in Danzig.
  • Should "Stollergrund" be wikilinked? (I found it in the Service history section)
    • Should be Danzig - not sure why I typed Stettin. There's no article for Stollergrund, but I suppose a redlink is fine (I checked the German wiki as well, and there's no article there either, FWIW). Parsecboy (talk) 11:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion 2[edit]

The article is well-referenced using offline references, which I will accept in good faith. A separate ref section and inline citations are used. This criterion is a pass.

Criterion 3[edit]

All sections covered by its contemporaries are included here. The article appears sufficiently focused and does not stray off topic very much. This criterion is a pass.

Criterion 4[edit]

There were no blatant violations of neutrality in the article. This criterion is a pass.

Criterion 5[edit]

Looks like you've been with this article from the beginning. Edit history checks out, and the article is stable. This criterion is a pass.

Criterion 6[edit]

The copyright status of both images is documented and valid. Both the images and captions are relevant, and the captions concise. This criterion is a pass.

Overall comments[edit]

You are really good at these articles. :) Two comments involving prose to be resolved, and this one will be a pass. --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 08:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    • Thanks, I've been writing them for over four years now :) In that time, I've gotten a lot of experience writing them. Parsecboy (talk) 11:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • Those four years really have done you (and Wikipedia) well. I never even knew a 62 article topic was possible!
      • I'm passing this article momentarily. Again, good work! --Starstriker7 - public(talk) 16:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]