Talk:SMS Panther (1885)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Well constructed, will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Section 1; All good, consistency maintained, conversion templates and units are fine.
- Section 2; para 1; "Shew as completed on 31 December 1885", this sentence needs to be fixed. It is meaningless.
- Section 2; para 3; last sentence; "Britain received Leopard as a war prize in 1920", but why is Leopard mentioned here. Is there something connected to this?
- @Parsecboy: Flawlessly constructed apart from some minor issues. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Both fixed, good catches on both. Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: