Jump to content

Talk:SMS Wörth/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    The Boxer Rebellion section reads oddly with the mention of too few troops and then a list of the ships in the East Asia Squadron.
    Let me know if the changes made to Hela work and I can do something similar here.
    That would work just fine.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance:
    Provide conversions of displacement in the infobox. Why are her measurements given in English units in the infobox when the Germans used metric? Provide a conversion for the belt armor. Presumably the hole from the grounding was measured in square meters, not depth. Why are conversions provided for some gun sizes in the main body and not others? I changed them to use the proper hyphen as they're adjectives.
    I think I've got all these. But as with Hela, the hyphens are only for full units, not the abbreviations per Tony's comment at the Bayern class FAC.
    Actually I'd disagree; the hyphens are needed with or without the abbreviations, as per the convert template. But I'll look at the FAC and see what he said.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd missed these earlier, but many references need place of publication plus title and pages for the articles.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I think I've got these now. Parsecboy (talk) 17:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    When exactly was Hipper assigned aboard? It's not clear if that was on her first commission or not. Type and number of boilers is also needed.
    Year and boiler # and type added.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    A drawing showing the deck plan would be useful. It may be most appropriate for the class article, but it's still good on the individual ship articles.
    Added.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: