Talk:SM U-5 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi there again, (it looks like it's unfashionable to review military GAs at the moment!) I am happy to tell you that once again this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement (its nice to see that pointers I gave on previous reviews have been taken up on nominated articles, I quite often see the opposite). Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with a suggestion for future development. This is not required to achieve GA standard, but might help in future A-class or FAC review process.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review and your suggestions, which are always appreciated. (To me, it's not about getting a particular award for an article, but making it the best that it can be.) — Bellhalla (talk) 05:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

• "The Italian captain received the Medaglia d'Oro al Valore Militare for his sacrifice" - is there a better way to put this than sacrifice? It sounds a little melodramatic.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Changed to "… for his actions." instead.
• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail: