Talk:SM UB-16/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Well written: Pass
- One minor issue though:
- "UB-16 and sister boat UB-17 comprised an order of two submarines ordered - a little redundant
- How about: "The German Imperial Navy ordered UB-16 and sister boat UB-17 which comprised an order of two submarines ordered…" to make it really redundant? Or I could just change the ordered to placed. :) — Bellhalla (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- "UB-16 and sister boat UB-17 comprised an order of two submarines ordered - a little redundant
- One minor issue though:
- Factually Accurate: Pass
- Broad in its coverage: Looks good, pass
- Neutral: I see no issues, pass
- Stable: Pass
- Images: Everything checks out, valid fair-use for File:German submarine SM UB-16.jpg - Pass
Very nice work, Belhalla. Parsecboy (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)