Talk:SR V class/GA1

GA Reassessment

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

Where books or journals are being used as references, the relevant pages should also be given.

It's often easier to separate the References into Notes and Bibliography, to make it easier to provide references to different pages in the same book.

"... the last in a long line operating on Southern metals." May be OK for a specialist article, but this is an encyclopedia that ought to be accessible to a general reader.

What is the source for the information given in the table in Naming the locomotives?

Imperial to metric conversions are given in the infobox, but not in the article body.

The two pictures in the Gallery should be incorporated into the article body.

"It represented the last utilisation of this wheel arrangement in Britain, and was regarded as the most powerful class of 4-4-0 in Britain, and possibly the world." Extraordinary claims need extaordinary sources, but this uncited statement in the lead is not supported by anything in the article itself.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and created own page for locomotive details. Once again, this is another article that I shall work on in future. --Bulleid Pacific (talk) 15:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks. I've closed this review now. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]