Talk:SS Arietta

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Too much detail

IMO, there is too much detail in this article for an encyclopedic entry. It reads more like a laundry list of movements than a readable piece of prose. It needs some consolidation and better focus. Gatoclass (talk) 03:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Were every Empire ship article the same in this respect, I'd agree with you. Some ships get better coverage than others. The detailed war history of a few serves to illustrate the service of the majority. the MV Empire Creek article could have been given the same treatment, but I chose not to. Mjroots (talk) 19:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]